wrong_number_of_type_arguments_constructor

The constructor '{0}.{1}' doesn't have type parameters.

The dot shorthand resolves to the constructor '{0}.{1}', and type parameters can't be applied to dot shorthand constructor invocations.

The analyzer produces this diagnostic when type arguments are provided after the name of a named constructor. Constructors can't declare type parameters, so invocations can only provide the type arguments associated with the class, and those type arguments are required to follow the name of the class rather than the name of the constructor.

The following code produces this diagnostic because the type parameters (<String>) follow the name of the constructor rather than the name of the class:

class C<T> {
  C.named();
}
C f() => C.named<String>();

If the type arguments are for the class' type parameters, then move the type arguments to follow the class name:

class C<T> {
  C.named();
}
C f() => C<String>.named();

If the type arguments aren't for the class' type parameters, then remove them:

class C<T> {
  C.named();
}
C f() => C.named();